Crypto world

Base Layer 2: Navigating Corporate Profit and Decentralization in Crypto Payments

Base Layer 2 faces scrutiny over sequencer fee transfers to Coinbase, raising questions about decentralization and community engagement in crypto payments.

Base Layer 2 faces scrutiny over sequencer fee transfers to Coinbase, raising questions about decentralization and community engagement in crypto payments.

Base. Coinbase's new Base Layer 2 payment processing crypto solution is stirring up some serious debate in the crypto world. Apparently, all the sequencer fees go straight to Coinbase, and some folks are not happy about it. The question is, can Base still be seen as decentralized if the money is being sent to a centralized entity?

The Base Payment Gateway and Its Fee Structure

Base, built on the OP Stack, is supposed to make it easy for developers to deploy apps with low fees. But then we find out that all the fees collected for bundling transactions before they hit Ethereum’s mainnet are going to Coinbase. That's a big red flag for a lot of people. These fees usually help keep the network running and evolving. Instead, they’re heading straight to Coinbase, raising questions about transparency and whether it's all about profit.

Corporate Influence vs. Decentralization in Crypto Payments

The debate is heating up. Is Base still "Ethereum aligned" if the money isn't going back into the ecosystem? With Base reportedly raking in $120 million in fees but only putting $10 million towards Ethereum’s data availability and security costs, it looks like Coinbase is pocketing a lot of that cash. This is definitely not what decentralization is about, and it could lead to a less engaged community.

Community Engagement and Transaction Payments

When a large chunk of the money goes to a centralized company, it can make the community feel less involved. This isn't great for fostering a decentralized ecosystem. If transaction payments were distributed transparently, at least the community would feel they had a stake in it.

Alternative Models for Fee Distribution: Web 3 Payment Solutions

There are better ways to do this. Here are a few ideas:

  • Airdrops: Give tokens to the community members; it's a nice way to say thanks and get them involved.
  • Proof-of-Stake (PoS): Let the people who own tokens stake them; it gives them a voice in the process.
  • Community Grants: Use some of that money to fund community projects; it helps bring innovation.
  • Sliding Scale Fees: Charge people what they can actually pay; sounds fair, right?

These ideas could help Base do more than just rake in profits.

Summary: The Future of Base and Decentralization in Payment Processing

As Base tries to find a balance between making money and keeping the community happy, its future as a Layer 2 solution is at stake. If they want to stay in line with what decentralization is supposed to be, they need to rethink their fee structure. They should make it about more than just profit and work to make the community feel involved and valued.

More in 

Crypto world

Get the best sent to your inbox, every month

Thanks a lot for subscribing!
Something went wrong! Please try again
Once monthly, no spam